We had a client doing property valuation report for a large university with many locations and MS Office was a nightmare to work with. Having a native version will help my work place a hell of a lot as I find in Printing OO is much more reliable for document creation than MS Office. One of my gripes has been trying to advocate OO to Mac users yet setting it up on OSX can be a PITA. GNU/Linux, BSD and Solaris are nowadays way faster than any of the big two “consumer-friendly” commercial operating systems.
Instead of one incompetent company we now have two. Now Microsoft have managed to do the same with Vista. I don’t know how Apple have managed to get to this low-point performance-wise but it’s a huge accomplishment in and of itself. I would have preferred a real native implementation in C/C++/ObjC for performance reasons but it doesn’t look that way from what I have read. Then we can talk about performance problems on Mac OS X. So instead of defending your precious vendor through all of its faults you’d better start demanding a decent X server and kernel implementation. runs fine as well.Īnd Apple’s X implementation is really bad.
#Openoffice viewer for mac mac os x
My reference for performance is Slackware Linux and Mac OS X doesn’t even come close in reliability, stability and speed. When I could say just as well that Mac OS X’s performance overall is crap. runs fine on Windows, Linux and Solaris so it must be possible to make it run on Mac OS X as well with reasonable performance. I don’t think so but then I’m a Linux user.
0 kommentar(er)
